Wednesday, 1 January 2020





10 Year Anniversary of Climate Gate

It’s Officially the Tenth Anniversary of Climategate – and they’ve learned nothing
By Charles Rotter and Anthony Watts
From Charles:
It was ten years ago today that I personally first viewed the instructions to download the Climategate files from the anonymous Russian server.  That set in motion a series of events still affecting the outcome of worldwide energy and environmental policy today.  The whitewashers at the BBC, The Guardian, and elsewhere have started putting up their officially sanctioned narrative version, amounting to little more than nothing to see hear move along.
I wrote up my contemporaneous version of events here.
Anyone who wants to rebut claims of exoneration can use this Ross McKitrick paper for reference.


November 15, 2019

Did climate scientists learn anything from Climategate?
Looking forward, should Climategate matter? Only if scientists failed to learn the appropriate lessons.
At the time of Climategate, I wrote an essay entitled  On the credibility of climate research.
I raised four key issues:
·         Lack of transparency,
·         climate tribalism,
·         the need for improved analysis and
·         communication of uncertainty, and
·         engagement with ‘skeptics’ and critics of our work.
At the time, I was rather astonished by the failure of climate science ‘leaders’ (apart from the climagaters defending themselves) to make public statements about this and show some leadership.
Interesting insights into the ‘leadership’ void at the time of Climategate are revealed by a tranche of emails obtained by the CEI [link] dated the first half of 2010, involving scientists involved iClimategate emails as well as others who are regarded as the keepers of the IPCC ‘flame’ – e.g. Michael Oppenheimer, Steve Schneider, Gabi Hegerl, Eric Steig, Kevin Trenberth.



"At the time, climate-change deniers were desperate to find ways to undermine the idea that global warming was real" and



SUN_Climate_20200101


DOCUMENTING EARTH CHANGES DURING THE NEXT GSM AND POLE SHIFT
PROFESSOR VALENTINA ZHARKOVA’S ‘EXPANDED’ ANALYSIS STILL CONFIRMS SUPER GRAND SOLAR MINIMUM (2020-2055)
Professor Valentina Zharkova’s recent paper ‘Oscillations of the Baseline of Solar Magnetic Field and Solar Irradiance on a Millennial Timescale’ has been accepted for publishing in Nature. It confirms a Grand Solar Minimum (GSM) from 2020 to 2055, as all four magnetic fields of the sun go out of phase, while also suggesting centuries of natural warming post-Minima.

Zharkova’s team’s expanded ‘double dynamo’ calculations match-up almost perfectly with the timelines of past Grand Minimas: the Maunder Minimum (1645–1715), Wolf minimum (1300–1350), Oort minimum (1000–1050), Homer minimum (800–900 BC); as well as with the past Grand Maximas: the Medieval Warm Period (900–1200), the Roman Warm Period (400–150 BC), and so on…
Coming as somewhat of a surprise however, Zharkova’s full and expanded analysis reveals the sun, following its next GSM cycle (2020-2055), will actually enter a 300+ year spell of increased-activity warming the earth at a rate of 0.5C (0.9F) per century, running until the next GSM cycle (2370-2415).
Succeeding that cooling period (2415-onward), the world, according to Zharkova, will continue on with its warming trend, again at an average of 0.5C (0.9F) per century, until the year 2600 when the sun will flip to a prolonged cooling phase running for the next 1000 years (and likely propelling Earth into the next ice age).


Our star is effectively shutting down, starting next year (2020).
The upcoming GSM is forecast (by Zharkova herself, among others) to be similar to the Maunder Minimum (1645-1715) — a time when sunspots were exceedingly rare and much of the planet experienced colder than average temperatures.
We are already seeing an increase in unstable weather patterns, as the weakest solar cycle in over 100 years (SC24) continues to weaken the jet stream, reverting it’s usual zonal (tight) flow to more of a meridional (wavy) one.



14 Jan 2018 - A solar minimum is the low activity trough of the 11-year solar cycle (Schwabe Cycle). ... 1645 and 1715) that coincided with the coldest phase of the Little Ice Age. ... warming, as in the Roman Warm Period, the Medieval Climate Optimum and ... Even when – in a given year – average temperatures are only ...

14 Jan 2018 - A solar minimum is the low activity trough of the 11-year solar cycle (Schwabe Cycle). ... 1645 and 1715) that coincided with the coldest phase of the Little Ice Age. ... warming, as in the Roman Warm Period, the Medieval Climate Optimum and ... Even when – in a given year – average temperatures are only ...
It confirms a Grand Solar Minimum (GSM) from 2020 to 2055, as all four ... with the past Grand Maximas: the Medieval Warm Period (900–1200), the Roman Warm ... reveals the sun, following its next GSM cycle (2020-2055), will actually enter a ... cooling period beginning 2020 should be enough to give almost-every living ...

<Solar Minimums are periods where there are fewer sunspots – associated with cooler weather e.g. Britain's "Little Ice Age" (about c1300 to c1850.)>
An approaching Grand Solar Minimum is gaining evermore support. ... NASA's forecast for the next solar cycle (25) reveals it will be the weakest of the last 200 years. ... about space weather are good news for mission planners who can schedule ... to the Dalton Minimum (1790-1830) but gives no mention of the brutal cold, ...

“If the upcoming solar max of cycle 24 is normal or robust,” I continued, “and ... This affects us because Earth's climate gets cooler when there are fewer solar storms. ... warmer than at the time of the Maunder Minimum and says that a return to a .... and volcanic eruptions that tend to be a part of the Grand Solar Minimum.

An uptick in high-level volcanic eruptions is also associated with low solar activity. Increasing Cosmic Rays are believed to heat the muons in subsurface silica-rich magma (click here for more on that). And larger eruptions (ones that fire volcanic ash above 32,800 feet (10 km) and into the Stratosphere) have a direct cooling effect on the planet, as these ejected particulates effectively block out the sun.

An approaching Grand Solar Minimum is gaining evermore support. Even NASA appears to be on-board, with their recent SC25 prediction — though, predictably, they stay clear of the implications.
NASA’s forecast for the next solar cycle (25) reveals it will be the weakest of the last 200 years.
The maximum of this next cycle — measured in terms of sunspot number, a standard measure of solar activity level — could be 30 to 50% lower than the most recent one.
The agency’s results show that the next cycle will start in 2020 and reach its maximum in 2025:

NASA Solar Cycle website




Global Warming by CO2 or Cooling by Grand Solar Flare Minimum?

The next Grand Solar Minimum, Cosmic Rays and Earth Changes (an introduction)

https://abruptearthchanges.com/2018/01/14/climate-change-grand-solar-minimum-and-cosmic-rays/


https://www.whatsorb.com/news/global-warming-by-co2-or-cooling-by-a-grand-solar-minimum?

NASA’s forecast for the next solar cycle (25) reveals it will be the weakest of the last 200 years. - 30 to 50% lower than the most recent one


The next Solar Cycle (25) will be the weakest of the last 200 years.
NASA’s results show that the next cycle will start in 2020 and reach its maximum in 2025
DOCUMENTING EARTH CHANGES DURING THE NEXT GSM AND POLE SHIFT
PROFESSOR VALENTINA ZHARKOVA’S ‘EXPANDED’ ANALYSIS STILL CONFIRMS SUPER GRAND SOLAR MINIMUM (2020-2055)
Professor Valentina Zharkova’s recent paper ‘Oscillations of the Baseline of Solar Magnetic Field and Solar Irradiance on a Millennial Timescale’ has been accepted for publishing in Nature. It confirms a Grand Solar Minimum (GSM) from 2020 to 2055, as all four magnetic fields of the sun go out of phase, while also suggesting centuries of natural warming post-Minima.

Zharkova’s team’s expanded ‘double dynamo’ calculations match-up almost perfectly with the timelines of past Grand Minimas: the Maunder Minimum (1645–1715), Wolf minimum (1300–1350), Oort minimum (1000–1050), Homer minimum (800–900 BC); as well as with the past Grand Maximas: the Medieval Warm Period (900–1200), the Roman Warm Period (400–150 BC), and so on…
Coming as somewhat of a surprise however, Zharkova’s full and expanded analysis reveals the sun, following its next GSM cycle (2020-2055), will actually enter a 300+ year spell of increased-activity warming the earth at a rate of 0.5C (0.9F) per century, running until the next GSM cycle (2370-2415).
Succeeding that cooling period (2415-onward), the world, according to Zharkova, will continue on with its warming trend, again at an average of 0.5C (0.9F) per century, until the year 2600 when the sun will flip to a prolonged cooling phase running for the next 1000 years (and likely propelling Earth into the next ice age).


Our star is effectively shutting down, starting next year (2020).
The upcoming GSM is forecast (by Zharkova herself, among others) to be similar to the Maunder Minimum (1645-1715) — a time when sunspots were exceedingly rare and much of the planet experienced colder than average temperatures.
We are already seeing an increase in unstable weather patterns, as the weakest solar cycle in over 100 years (SC24) continues to weaken the jet stream, reverting it’s usual zonal (tight) flow to more of a meridional (wavy) one.

14 Jan 2018 - A solar minimum is the low activity trough of the 11-year solar cycle (Schwabe Cycle). ... 1645 and 1715) that coincided with the coldest phase of the Little Ice Age. ... warming, as in the Roman Warm Period, the Medieval Climate Optimum and ... Even when – in a given year – average temperatures are only ...


Wednesday, 27 November 2019

EU Parliament called to Reject 'Climate Emergency' Vote

https://www.thegwpf.com/european-groups-call-on-meps-to-reject-climate-emergency-vote/

European Groups Call On MEPs To Reject ‘Climate Emergency’ Vote

  • Date: 27/11/19
  • European Climate Realist Network
... Only last week, a declaration by more than 700 scientists and researchers was presented in the European Parliament, showing that global warming is happening, but is far more gradual and far less detrimental to the wellbeing of people and societies than activists have been claiming. ...

Thursday, 21 November 2019

ClimateGate Tenth Anniversary

The Climatic Research Unit email controversy began in November 2009 with the hacking of a server at the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA) by an external attacker, copying thousands of emails and computer files, Climatic Research Unit documents to various internet locations.


10 Year Anniversary of Climate Gate

It’s Officially the Tenth Anniversary of Climategate – and they’ve learned nothing
By Charles Rotter and Anthony Watts
From Charles:
It was ten years ago today that I personally first viewed the instructions to download the Climategate files from the anonymous Russian server.  That set in motion a series of events still affecting the outcome of worldwide energy and environmental policy today.  The whitewashers at the BBC, The Guardian, and elsewhere have started putting up their officially sanctioned narrative version, amounting to little more than nothing to see hear move along.
I wrote up my contemporaneous version of events here.
Anyone who wants to rebut claims of exoneration can use this Ross McKitrick paper for reference.

By Charles Rotter and Anthony Watts
From Charles:
It was ten years ago today that I personally first viewed the instructions to download the Climategate files from the anonymous Russian server.  That set in motion a series of events still affecting the outcome of worldwide energy and environmental policy today.  The whitewashers at the BBC, The Guardian, and elsewhere have started putting up their officially sanctioned narrative version, amounting to little more than nothing to see hear move along.
I wrote up my contemporaneous version of events here.
Anyone who wants to rebut claims of exoneration can use this Ross McKitrick paper for reference.


November 15, 2019
Did climate scientists learn anything from Climategate?
Looking forward, should Climategate matter? Only if scientists failed to learn the appropriate lessons.
At the time of Climategate, I wrote an essay entitled  On the credibility of climate research.
I raised four key issues:
  • ·         Lack of transparency,
  • ·         climate tribalism,
  • ·         the need for improved analysis and
  • ·         communication of uncertainty, and
  • ·         engagement with ‘skeptics’ and critics of our work.

At the time, I was rather astonished by the failure of climate science ‘leaders’ (apart from the climagaters defending themselves) to make public statements about this and show some leadership.
Interesting insights into the ‘leadership’ void at the time of Climategate are revealed by a tranche of emails obtained by the CEI [link] dated the first half of 2010, involving scientists involved iClimategate emails as well as others who are regarded as the keepers of the IPCC ‘flame’ – e.g. Michael Oppenheimer, Steve Schneider, Gabi Hegerl, Eric Steig, Kevin Trenberth.





The Climategate Emails

Ten Years On

Monday, 11 November 2019



A Good Summary of the Little Ice Age


Between 1300 and 1850, the Earth experienced a Little Ice Age whose cause to this day is not known.


https://interestingengineering.com/the-little-ice-age-what-happened-around-the-world?utm_source=CCNet+Newsletter&utm_campaign=2ce5aa9597-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_05_16_03_17&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_fe4b2f45ef-2ce5aa9597-36411009

Quick Summary of Liklihood of Problems by Atmospheric Scientists




Another way of thinking about the so-called 2C limit is by analogous to a high-way speed limit.  If the speed limit is 65 mph, exceeding that by 10 or even 20 mph is not guaranteed to cause a crash, but if you exceed the limit by a lot, your risk of a fatal crash certainly increases.

Larry Kummer has a post today Did the IPCC predict a climate apocalypse? No.
[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]
“There is nothing in this Special Report justifying belief that the world will end, that the world will burn, or that humanity will go extinct. It has been misrepresented just as past reports have been (e.g., the 4th US National Climate Assessment). The disasters described the Climate Emergency and Extinction Rebellion activists are those of RCP8.5, the worst-case scenario in the IPCC’s Fifth Assessment report – or even beyond it. RCP8.5 is, as a worst-case scenario should be, a horrific but not apocalyptic future that is improbable or impossible.”

JC conclusion
Bottom line is that these timelines are meaningless.  While we have confidence in the sign of the temperature change, we have no idea what its magnitude will turn out to be. 
 With regards to species and ecosystems, land use and exploitation is a far bigger issue.

Cleaner sources of energy have several different threads of justification, but thinking that sending CO2 emissions to zero by 2050 or whenever is going to improve the weather and the environment by 2100 is a pipe dream.  If such reductions come at the expense of economic development, then vulnerability to extreme weather events will increase.