It may have been the increasingly strident voices dismissing any issues raised about the IPCC’s position – a very unscientific attitude which makes sceptical me think they have something to hide. Or it could have been hearing that the historic ice-core evidence didn’t show carbon-dioxide increase prior to warming.So I'm reviewing the science here.
Wednesday 8 August 2018
Just because we are living through a year as hot as 1976 we have more lurid headlines of catastrophe. So I will re-iterate that:-
That the Earth will, over 100 years or so, become catastrophically warm, is unproven; and cannot be proven.
Climate scientists do not understand the naturally occurring cycles sufficiently well, and cannot calculate the earth's global average temperature sufficiently well, to have any certainty.
The advocates of the policy to reduce carbon-dioxide use are using the Precautionary Principle, but without considering suficiently whether alternative policies wouldn't be more effective, and do less harm.
I recommend that whenever current conditions are used to blow up scare stories, you consult https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/
Yesterday's post addresses the current headlines ...
http://perhapsallnatural.blogspot.com/2018/06/dr-judith-currys-debates-climate-change.html